| |
New Poll idea |
| |
(09:17 6/11/2001)
johnstlr (10:44 6/11/2001)
andrew (14:02 6/11/2001)
andrew (10:37 14/11/2001)
moss (11:04 15/11/2001)
johnstlr (12:54 15/11/2001)
rich (13:16 15/11/2001)
andrew (13:32 15/11/2001)
[mentat] (14:58 15/6/2002)
andrew (14:58 15/6/2002)
ToiletDuck (14:58 15/6/2002)
rich (14:58 15/6/2002)
andrew (10:09 16/11/2001)
moss (14:58 15/6/2002)
alpha (22:26 15/11/2001)
|
| |
|
andrew |
Message #5768, posted at 09:17, 6/11/2001 |
| Unregistered user
|
How about:
How many people would buy Cerilica TopModel:
Yes, whole package
No
Yes, upgrade
If animation facilities included
Only animation facilities |
| |
 [ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
johnstlr |
Message #5769, posted at 10:44, 6/11/2001, in reply to message #5768 |
| Unregistered user
|
I'd be surprised if you could buy the animation facilities as a separate package. Surely they'd be a plugin to the main product? The other four options are reasonable though. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
andrew |
Message #5770, posted at 14:02, 6/11/2001, in reply to message #5769 |
| Unregistered user
|
I mean as a separate upgrade as opposed to the TopModel engine upgrade. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
andrew |
Message #5771, posted at 10:37, 14/11/2001, in reply to message #5770 |
| Unregistered user
|
Presumably, no poll idea has been submitted that is acceptable yet as the previous one is still there and 'neither' is mysteriously continuing to creep up. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
moss |
Message #5772, posted at 11:04, 15/11/2001, in reply to message #5771 |
| Unregistered user
|
How about when did you last buy Acorn User? last issue
three issues ago
A year ago
Three years ago
Seven years ago
Never. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
johnstlr |
Message #5773, posted at 12:54, 15/11/2001, in reply to message #5772 |
| Unregistered user
|
How about... Concerning AU (or, indeed any product) do you buy it
buy it, moan about it, but continue buying it
don't buy it
don't buy it and still moan about it In light of some of the comments being made I wonder why the people at AU bother. I can only assume it still provides useful income, perhaps to help get other projects off the ground as Tau Press certainly do not have all their eggs in the AU basket. I still think the state of the magazine reflects the state of the market. Think about it. Oh and yes I do subscribe to AU. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
rich |
Message #5774, posted at 13:16, 15/11/2001, in reply to message #5773 |
| Unregistered user
|
Concerning AU (or, indeed any product) do you buy it
buy it, moan about it, but continue buying it
don't buy it
don't buy it and still moan about it
LOL! That's good enough for me! |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
andrew |
Message #5775, posted at 13:32, 15/11/2001, in reply to message #5774 |
| Unregistered user
|
Looks good.
May I make a sugestion and say that you freeze the result after a couple of weeks? |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
alpha |
Message #5780, posted at 22:26, 15/11/2001, in reply to message #5779 |
| Unregistered user
|
Why should everyone subscribe to AU? Last time I had a chance to have a flick through there really was very little in there that was of interest to me, and the standard seemed very poor. When there are other better RISC OS magazines available, why pay £4.20 for the wafer thin AU? Just because it's a newsstand magazine? (Getting a bit off-topic for this forum, might want to move it to the General one) |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
andrew |
Message #5782, posted at 10:09, 16/11/2001, in reply to message #5781 |
| Unregistered user
|
Foiled again :aargh: |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
I don't have tourettes you're just a cun |
Message #5776, posted by [mentat] at 14:58, 15/6/2002, in reply to message #5775 |
![[mentat]](/images/smileys/mentat.gif) Fear is the mind-killer
Posts: 6266
|
Nah, don't do that - imagine all those poor RISC OS enthusiasts just dying to give their opinion, but find, on return from their 2 week winter holidays that they can't!
I presume you made that comment out of irritation at people who vote repeatedly, but once everyone has voted, even that sort of poll flooding behaviour can only influence the results marginally, so I say  s to it!
|
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
andrew |
Message #5777, posted at 14:58, 15/6/2002, in reply to message #5776 |
| Unregistered user
|
That's :richard: coming from you ;-)
Only joking, sorry <br><br>[Edited by andrew at 15:40, 15/11/2001]
Ah seems Rich has changed his smiley :-(
[Edited by andrew at 15:40, 15/11/2001] |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Mark Quint |
Message #5778, posted by ToiletDuck at 14:58, 15/6/2002, in reply to message #5777 |
 Quack Quack
Posts: 1016
|
does this work?  |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
moss |
Message #5779, posted at 14:58, 15/6/2002, in reply to message #5773 |
| Unregistered user
|
I must admit, I do think everyone should subscribe to AU. I let my sub lax and meant to get it renewed at RISC OS 2001, but couldn't make it down. I'll send off me form tonight  Whilst I think it's understandable to criticise the magazine in some respects, I don't think it's fair to personally criticise Steve Turnbull. He's in a difficult position, he had kept the magazine alive, and he's put a lot into the community. And Acorn User used to be fantastic when he was in charge - it's only recently, presumably down to lack of time/money that problems have arisen. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
rich |
Message #5781, posted at 14:58, 15/6/2002, in reply to message #5777 |
| Unregistered user
|
That's :richard: coming from you ;-)
<snip>
Ah seems Rich has changed his smiley Nope, just your dodgy memory  |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
